What are libraries for?
Error Message
ERROR input ended inside -- ... --
Error Message
ERROR input ended inside -- ... --
The following quotes are from David Lewis's 1998 article
What if LIbraries are
Artifact-Bound Institutions
Libraries are artifact-bound institutions, and as such, will be
replaced as the dominant technology for information
communication moves from tangible objects to electronic bits on
a network. As this transition occurs, it is important to
understand not what libraries have done, but rather what they
are for. Libraries make information easily, publicly, and
cheaply available. They are the means through which
organizations and communities subsidize the distribution of
information to residents and members. Without such support,
information is underused, and its potential benefit is lost. As
the library fades as the channel for this subsidy, it is
critical that the subsidy itself is not lost. If it is, our
organizations will be less effective and our communities
poorer. By understanding these issues, librarians can shape the
information economy so that institutional and community subsidy
is maintained, and new technologies enhance and extend
information availability. If preserving the library as an
institution is our focus, we will fail in these tasks.
What are libraries for?
The primary
function of most libraries for the last century and a half has
been to make the artifacts that contain information -books,
serials, newspapers, and their derivatives - easily and
conveniently available to individuals in organizations and
communities. Libraries have stored, organized, and preserved
these artifacts in ways that no single individual could. While
many people collect books, and most buy newspapers and
magazines, libraries have been the place to go when one's
personal collection was not sufficient, and the place for those
with limited economic means to gain access to what they could
not otherwise afford. Communities and organizations fund these
activities because they recognize that libraries create a
common good. Libraries make information more available to the
individuals in communities and organizations than would be the
case if individuals were left to their own devices. This in
turn makes the organization more productive and enhances the
quality of life in communities.
Digital Age
- The individual is much more in charge
of his access to information resources (does he need the
library?)
- The space (building) is more valuable
without books
- The faculty member still need you to
buy things (80%)
- Libraries and gateways only (60%)
Supporting undergraduate education and teaching information
literacy to students are chief priorities for academic
libraries, trumping their traditional emphasis on
collection-building and the preservation and discovery of
research materials.
But the faculty are not buying it (are they?)
Information Subsidies
Community access to proprietary access
... it is easy to imagine the "library" as a small office with
a couple of staff members who negotiate contracts with content
providers, survey users, and lobby funding bodies. The content
providers will be largely in the private sector and will create
the content and the necessary, infrastructure. The library is
effectively "out-sourced," and dollars once spent on buildings,
printed materials, and staff are now spent on contracts that
provide access rights.
Free and Open Distribution of Content
To quote Lyman, "Nearly all knowledge is created and consumed
within gift exchange systems, not markets that is, by groups whose very social glue
consists of sharing knowledge."[9] This is
http://www.slideshare.net/nitle/david-lewis-on-libraries?qid=5cbc0fd8-6bf9-4ea2-b001-3a4769c2abd5&v=qf1&b=&from_search=1